L. Tien
To Win
M. Giron
To Win
Learner Tien vs Adam Neff Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L L L L W W L
Form
L L W L L W L L L LHead-2-Head: Tien 1 - 0 Neff
They have played 2 sets in total, with Tien winning 2 and Neff winning 0. The last match between Tien and Neff was at the M25 Columbus, 17-11-2023, Quarterfinals, I.hard with Learner Tien getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Learner Tien | 1 |
| Adam Neff | 0 |
M25 Columbus(17-11-2023)
6
3
6
1
Upcoming Match
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Dzumhur VS Bellucci PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Maneiro VS Sherif PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Learner Tien
Player
Adam Neff
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
48%
(
22 of
46)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
4
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:10:0 | Average Match Time | 1:10:0 |
| 58% (32/55) | 1st Serve % | 48% (22/46) |
| 78% (25/32) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (13/22) |
| 39% (9/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 25% (6/24) |
| 63% (5/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 59% (27/46) | Return Points Win % | 38% (21/55) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Learner Tien Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Learner Tien
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Henri Squire
54%
(
40 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
7
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
Learner Tien
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Fonseca
Player
Learner Tien
64%
(
63 of
99)
1st Serve %
62%
(
67 of
108)
10
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
47 of
67)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
31 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
39 of
108)
107
Total Points Won
100
|
6-7(1) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Learner Tien
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
87)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Learner Tien
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
83)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Alexander Zverev
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
4
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
0
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Cameron Norrie
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
54 of
77)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Dusan Lajovic
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
76%
(
71 of
93)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
41 of
71)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
93)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
7-5 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
view more
Adam Neff Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Zachary Viiala
Player
Adam Neff
53%
(
44 of
83)
1st Serve %
39%
(
31 of
79)
8
Aces
7
8
Double Faults
10
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Adam Neff
64%
(
61 of
95)
1st Serve %
53%
(
54 of
102)
9
Aces
14
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
33%
(
31 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
35 of
102)
99
Total Points Won
98
|
7-6(4) 2-6 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolas Arseneault
Player
Adam Neff
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
46%
(
34 of
74)
1
Aces
7
9
Double Faults
4
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
34 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 5-7 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tiago Torres
Player
Adam Neff
50%
(
33 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Neff
Player
Sekou Bangoura
40%
(
23 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Adam Neff
51%
(
37 of
73)
1st Serve %
45%
(
40 of
89)
9
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
6
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
33 of
40)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
89)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Adam Neff
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
9
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
0
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adam Neff
Player
Emmanuel Alex
45%
(
23 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Adam Neff
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
1
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Gavin Young
Player
Adam Neff
75%
(
89 of
118)
1st Serve %
56%
(
59 of
105)
5
Aces
13
4
Double Faults
8
70%
(
62 of
89)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
45 of
59)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
43 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
39 of
105)
114
Total Points Won
109
|
6-7(3) 6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 73% (118/43) | Win/Loss | 44% (24/30) |
| 65% (258/136) | Sets Win/Loss | 48% (62/68) |
| 55% (2050/1647) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (619/628) |
| 76% (92/29) | Hard Win/Loss | 42% (13/18) |
| 45% (5/6) | Clay Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) |
| 72% (21/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 47% (7/8) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.54 |
| 470 | Aces Total | 331 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.35 |
| 462 | Total Double Faults | 217 |
| 1:41:39 | Average Match Time | 1:31:42 |
| 333.99 | Average Opponent Rank | 378.69 |
| 63% (7296/11605) | 1st Serve % | 52% (1746/3360) |
| 67% (4916/7296) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (1271/1746) |
| 51% (2219/4309) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (809/1614) |
| 47% (596/1263) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (114/290) |
| 43% (4905/11540) | Return Points Win % | 37% (1256/3351) |
| 60% (6/4) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/4) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 65% (15/8) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 76% (39/12) | Challenger W/L | 31% (4/9) |
| 79% (58/15) | Futures W/L | 51% (20/19) |
| 75% (110/147) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 46% (24/52) |
| 50% (6/12) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 62% (39/63) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (9/19) |
| 75% (39/52) | Deciding Set Win % | 41% (9/22) |
| 95% (102/97) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 76% (25/19) |
| 5% (102/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 24% (25/6) |
| 36% (59/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (29/5) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
